Thursday, November 09, 2006

CFB Weekend Preview:
Northwestern Over Ohio St! (Uh, Right?)

I was light on posts today and since I'm settling in to watch Rutgers-Louisville tonight, I've got college football on the brain, so I figured I'd post my weekly CFB preview a little early.

Much like last week, the Game of the Week is being played on a Thursday night, leaving Saturday's slate to have interesting -- if indirect, at best -- national-title implications, but by no means dramatic. But there are several games that might hit the other BCS-level bowl games:

Northwestern over 1 Ohio St: NU is going to shock the world by beating OSU in Evanston on Saturday on a 3:30 national-TV game.

OK, does everyone know that I'm engaging in simple wishful thinking here? I don't REALLY think Northwestern will win, though I – and many others – certainly hope they do. But I harbor no actual hope.

21 Oregon over at 7 USC: Wasn't this supposed to be the first of the three "tough" games that USC was supposed to have that could threaten their unbeaten season? So much for that. USC's season is ruined; with that in mind, the Ducks add insult to a mortally injured USC season.

13 Tennessee over at 11 Arkansas: Tennessee's season ended last weekend at home with that very tough loss to LSU. But they can still ruin Arkansas' SEC West hopes. (Actually, one loss won't ruin Arkansas' SEC season. For Auburn to win the SEC West, Arkanasas has to lose TWICE.) But if Arkansas wins, it validates me ranking them No. 5 this week.

18 Wake Forest over at Florida St: If it wasn't for Rutgers, Wake Forest would be the Story of the Season. Wake is having their best season in a half-century. Who doesn't want to see ACC champ Wake Forest vs. Big East champ Rutgers in a BCS Bowl? Best. Bowl. Ever.

Best of the Rest (And see? I didn't even mention the juicy subplot of Steve Spurrier's homecoming to the Swamp. Upsets in bold.)

1 Ohio St over at Northwestern
2 Michigan over at Indiana
4 Texas over at Kansas St
5 Auburn over Georgia
6 Florida over S. Carolina
21 Oregon over at 7 USC
9 Notre Dame over at Air Force
10 W. Virginia over Cincinnati
13 Tennessee over at 11 Arkansas
12 LSU over Alabama
14 Boise St. over at San Jose St.
16 Wisconsin over at Iowa
Texas
Tech over at 17 Oklahoma
18 Wake Forest over at Florida St
19 GA Tech over at UNC
20 VA Tech over Kent St.
22 BC over Duke
Miami over at 23 Maryland
24 Texas A&M over Nebraska

-- D.S.

44 comments:

Jim said...

Dan, what's your Rutgers pick?

Mine: Rutgers 23, L'ville 20

Ma4tt (the 4 is silent) said...

Ok, Underwood tied the game with a nice snag. But... his name is Tiquan! Like TAE KWAN DO? Tiquan!

What's next? Some idiot names their kid Kamasutra?

This is fuggin' ridiculous.

Jim said...

Rutgers defense: looks awesome

Rutgers offense: looks bad

Rutgers special teams: unspeakably shitty

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

...ok. So, if Louisville is always trying to force fumbles, maybe I was too rough on their performance last Thursday.

But also - their offense doesn't look so epic right now, does it? How about 6 consecutive zero-gain plays, which would have been even worse if it hadn't been helped along by an unreasonable roughing call when the punt was actually blocked (sure, that punter always kicks that short, rotating that fast...)?

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

Fuck yeah tie game.

Jason (East Lansing) said...

What a game! Setting up for the FG now.

Jason (East Lansing) said...

Offsides on the miss I think.

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

Oh my God.

Did I say, bad penalties?

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

It's. Good.

Jason (East Lansing) said...

What a killer penalty. Straight through on the second and he had all the time in the world too.

Jason (East Lansing) said...

Game over because of the new clock rules.

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

Rutgers students are fucking retarded, huh?

Richard said...

DS,

Now lets see your rankings. You said one of the reasons to oot for Rutgers was to stick it the voters.

I dare you to rank Rutgers #3 now.

That where I have them. Thats where they are staying until they lose or until either Ohio State or Michigan loses at which point I'd have them #2.

By the way, I can't believe Louiville was offsides on that attempt.

Mike said...

RUTGERS! THE KICKER MAKERS A STOP!

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

Oh my god. Sack. Game. Over. I told you bitches.

Brendan Burke said...

OMG! That was awesome!

Jason (East Lansing) said...

Defense seals it, even though I'm shocked that no time came off the clock before the snap.

Mike said...

For the record, this is the 3rd straight Thursday we've seen a BCS bid crushed.

Richard said...

By the way, I now have Ray Rice ahead of Troy Smith if I was a Heisman voter.

Jason (East Lansing) said...

College football celebration rule:

You should not be allowed to rush the field after a big win while you wear a different team's hat.

Jim said...

THANK YOU JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- jim. rutgers college class of 2002.

Brendan Burke said...

Ok. Kirk Herbstreet and the rest of the people that are talking about the depth of the Big East need to hold on. They haven't beaten anyone. You could argue, not that I would, that because Rutgers is undefeated shows how poor the Big East is. I would wait to see some out of Conference games before I would crown the Big East back.

Jim said...

Hey Brendan:

SHUT THE FUCK UP

Brendan Burke said...

Why? Because I am raining on your parade. If you would have read my post, I SAID THAT I WOULDN'T SAY THAT. Do they not teach you how to read at Rutgers or do you just stop after the first sentence!

Brendan Burke said...

Like I said, Great game Rutgers! Congrats!

pedro said...

they just beat the number three team in the country, who beat the three team the week before. what more depth do you want?? they're undefeated in a BCS conference. If someone like Oregon was undefeated everyone would be behind them becuase of a "power conference" when the pac10 is thin after USC (who was proved to be not that great). The big east isn't poor it just has three real strong teams

Brendan Burke said...

I agree. I think that you have to rank them up there. Being undefeated in any Conference is impressive. BUT, I would like to see them or WVU or Louisville play someone's conference champ before you crown the Big East THE power conference. They have as much right to lay claim on the BCS championship game as any team.

GuyInTheCorner said...

i'd like to point out that this game although not as sloppy as the wvu/louisville game, was not good

exciting? yes
talented players? yes
good football? no

im not saying i didn't enjoy it, and i wanted rutgers to win and they did

but after that game the person who says that these two teams are great teams is kidding themself

pedro said...

i didnt say it was THE power conference. plus i'd like to see usc beat someone's top team or how about any of those supposed fantastic SEC schools. i'm not saying the big east is the best, but i'm just saying the same logic can be applied to everyone.


guyinthecorner, not a good football game? okay, now give some proof.

Brendan Burke said...

I wasn't saying that you did Pedro, but I think that some on ESPN are trying to make it out that way. Great game. Good, maybe great teams.

Mike said...

Someone needs to shut Mark May up: He thinks USC deserves to be in the NC game, because "their offense is back on track" and they're going to win out.

News Flash: They LOST to Oregon State, and took it out on a rotten Stanford team. Their offense is not very good, and the only reason they have a shot is no one in the Pac-10 plays defense.

Cody said...

Phase two is now compete. Next Phase three, WVU beats Rutgers and the Big East is "phased" out

Cody said...

Oops, forgot to give props to Rutgers..

One hell of a game, and good job Rutgers!

Dan Shanoff said...

Rutgers gets my vote for No. 2. I hope that many REAL voters will put them at No. 3, where they've earned. (I wonder how many will not jump them that high simply because they don't like the idea of moving a team from No. 15 to No. 3. Doesn't that sort of expose their own rankings as horribly flawed? Pollsters don't like to admit that kind of mistake.)

Meanwhile, I don't know how you could watch that game and call it crappy. You have to appreciate the insanely good defense being played by Rutgers against an offense that was arguably the most devastatingly effective in college football. RU basically took the "X-Box" offense and unplugged it (if not smashed the game console to pieces). It was a thing of beauty to watch that kind of domination, particularly in the second half.

Dan Shanoff said...

By the way, I don't know why Schiano didn't try the Bielema/Wisconsin kill-the-clock kickoff trick at the end of the game. Why even RISK a return for a TD or a game-ending Hail Mary? (Esp. since they had already given up a 100-yard TD on a KO return. What a totally appropriate and justifiable moment to break that tactic out!)

Brendan Burke said...

I had read that the Big 10 Officials called the head office at half time and told the officials that they could have called an unsportsmanlike penalty for that. Whether that is true or not is for someone else to report, but I know that many of the rules in CFB are not necessarily written ones and the officials have lots of room for judgment.

ChrTh said...

"I don't know why Schiano didn't try the Bielema/Wisconsin kill-the-clock kickoff trick at the end of the game. "

Because Louisville would've declined the penalty and there would've been no rekick. The only reason it worked for Wisconsin is because the return was so bad (plus it was the end of the half, not the game).

john (ann arbor, mi) said...

cornerguy -

I have been one of the people being rough on the Big East for the last week, last month, last two months, and I was one of the people who actually watched WVU-UL last Thursday and thus couldn't understand why writers kept suggesting that there was great football being played.

I say this only to highlight the fact that I don't just consider every highly-touted game to be very good. But I think good football was being played last night. I missed the first quarter, and thus most of UL's points, but in the second half, RU was playing real, great defense. As my (mildly insane) post at game's end was supposed to indicate, that last-play sack was brilliant, appropriate, and undeniable (has a defense ever gotten to a QB more fully on a play that big?).

I probably won't go so far as to call it great football, since Rutgers dropped more short, easy passes in the second half than Braylon Edwards in the Rose Bowl (i.e., a fucking ton) - in fact, if Louisville had a secondary, there might very well have been a couple picks on those tosses. But Rice put that team on his back, Rutgers engineered consecutive, necessary, beautiful, long drives, and the defense did what it had to. Good game.

nyc-steelers fan said...

As regarding your picks, I don't think the Ducks can win AT USC, who already had their let-down game. I don't think Tech will be able to stop the OU run game. And your Miami upset is definitely wishful thinking.

The upsets this week will be AF, at home, over the domers, and Nebraska beating A&M to wrap up the Big 12 Norris division (not much of an upset, I know). And you may be right about TN over AK (hope so, just to remove another one-loss team from the title picture; but AK has been flying so far under the radar all year; it would be interesting to see if they don't win out, beat UF, and then arguments about whether they deserve to be in Glendale...)

and boy oh boy, do I feel stupid this morning. I turned off the game at half-time because I didn't think it would be worth losing valuable shut-eye to watch Louisville beat the Knights. I don't really think Rutgers will beat the mountaineers, but if they do, they have GOT to go to glendale (assuming they win their other games as well...) Let's go Rutgers, complete the most unlikely season in college football history...

ndyanksfan05 said...

Thanks for including ND this week...much obliged.

Josh said...

First...IF USC can run the table they do deserve the National title game for having to have played one of the toughest schedules in the country.
2nd...for those that feel the Pac-10 is a week conference, then by all means come on out and see 2 of the top scoring offenses in the country in Cal and Oregon, and 3 of the top D's in the country in USC, Washington State, and UCLA. UCLA might not have the greatest record, but their defense has been tough all year.
3rd...Dan so last week you forget Notre Dame and now you forget Cal. Tsk Tsk Tsk. Granted, it wasn't like you were going to pick against Cal at Arizona this weekend.

Troy (Gainesville, FL) said...

Who doesn't want to see ACC champ Wake Forest vs. Big East champ Rutgers in a BCS Bowl? Best. Bowl. Ever.

Ugh. That would be horrible. Shades of Utah over Pitt in the Fiesta Bowl. If Rutgers wins the Big East, then the right thing is to put them up against a real team--like SEC champ Auburn/Florida or Big 12 Champ Texas--and not the team that managed to fuck up the least in the ACC.

But what I really fear is that the Big East Champ will have to face Boise, which will allow everyone next year to play the "they still haven't played anyone card." Again: ugh.

Also, don't let Rutgers' accomplishment last night be diminshed in your mind when USF takes out Louisville next week.

Dan Shanoff said...

I think you're wrong comparing it to Utah-Pitt.

You have to appreciate the historically atrocious records of both programs to appreciate what both reaching a BCS bowl -- and playing each other -- would mean.

I'm not saying it would be a great game. Then again, Ohio St-Notre Dame looked amazing on paper last year, and that was a freaking blow-out -- fun for OSU fans and ND-haters, but a shitty game if you like close games, good endings or competitive play in the least.

Andy said...

Ohio State beat ND 34-20 and got about half their yardage on four plays, not to mention got ND's game-tying fumble return for a score overturned on some VERY sketchy officiating (Anthony Gonzalez looked to be holding that ball to me). I fail to see how that was a "shitty" game, Dan.