Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Quickie Book Club:
"The Enlightened Bracketologist"

When I first found out that The Enlightened Bracketologist was going to be published, I sent frenzied emails to basically everyone I knew who was a sports fan/writer: "HOW DID WE NOT THINK OF THIS?!?!"

I fully admit: I have a bracket fetish. And so if, like me, you think that the NCAA Tournament's bracket structure is the most perfect thing in all of sports, then you will also agree that a book's premise is also damn near perfect:

Applying the "bracket" system to solve any/every argument.

Let me put it this way: It's cool enough that I would buy it in its current hardback edition for display on a coffee table. (At least it's displayed that way on mine.)

The authors scored a coup by writing very little of the book themselves. Even better: They got experts in each bracket's field to supply the seeding and the projection of how the bracket would advance:

Some of my favorites: Roz Chast on "Animation Characters"; Stanley Bing on "Corporate Jargon"; Stefan Fatsis on "Scrabble Words"; Jeff MacGregor on "NASCAR Phrases"; Steven Garvey on "Baby Boy Names" and Michael Solomon on "Jew/Not a Jew."

In terms of sports-specific brackets, they include March Madness Moments (naturally); Baseball Myths, Celebrity Sports Couples, Spotscaster Signature Calls, Golf Swing Thoughts, Innovations in Sports, Magical Sports Numbers, NASCAR Phrases, Sport/Not a Sport and Sports Books -- that's nearly 10 percent of the book, as it should be.

Editors Mark Reiter and Richard Sandomir (who you might know as the New York Times' sports media columnist) obviously had a ton of fun putting this together, and it shows.

If I was more clever (and had better knowledge of HTML), I would have done a meta-bracket of the book's bracket topics, but that's probably the best feature of the book:

As much as an "enlightened" look at some of the great arguments of our time, it can inspire countless more bracket-driven arguments. (Frankly, it sounds like a hell of a party game.)

I can just imagine that Reiter and Sandomir are already at work on a sequel. I just hope they ask me to participate. If not, I'll be sitting at home, doing them in my head anyway.

It's really one of the most fun books I have ever come across, and I highly recommend it.

-- D.S.

3 comments:

Big D said...

The real question is... are there 64 chapters? 32? 16?

Is there a play-in chapter to decide what becomes the "Foreword"?

Sorry, I'm having a little too much fun with this. Might have to actually read the book before I rip on it...

Brian in Oxford said...

...and what's with a guy named Steve Garvey determining names for lots of children? that's a bit odd....

Pete said...

I can second DS on this. I ordered it off of Amazon a couple weeks ago. It's fun and makes for some lively drunken debate.