Top storylines tracking today:
*
*Carroll staying at USC
*
*TK to stay at MNF
*Final Bloggies nag/beg
Pete Carroll staying at USC: Should it scare Trojans fans that Carroll even considered an NFL job? Or should it make them feel better, because the Fins job is just about as good as he would be offered by an NFL owner, and he still turned it down?
Either way, it's already time for me to modify my 2007 Top 5 to include USC:
There's a lot of hype to put LSU in that Top 5, but I think losing JaMarcus Russell will sting. And even though LSU gets the Gators in
(By the way, for all the talk about the BCS title game being an uncompetitive blowout – though the opposite direction from what all the experts predicted – it was still the 3rd most-watched BCS title game ever.)
Meanwhile, if 75 percent of voters are eventually going to vote for McGwire but are simply exacting some vigilante justice now, those guys should lose their vote, too.
Who would've figured that the BBWAA and its membership were at least as corrupted as the Steroid Era players themselves?
More on McGwire below.*
TK to stay at MNF. It's silly season among NFL and college coaches: Interviews, hirings, rumors, spin. Here's a piece of news that isn't necessarily a shocker, but is sort of an upset:
Tony Kornheiser is staying on for another season at "Monday Night Football." After a very spotty rookie season that never really lived up to its potential that had me so giddy the day before he officially started, there were rumors that he would quit (or be yoinked) or that they would replace him with fame-whore Tiki Barber. Instead, he'll get a second year to build on Year 1. That, or the money and fame was so damn awesome that he couldn't possibly walk away from it, no matter how pained he might have appeared on-screen to be doing the job.
College Hoops: Game of the Night:
Meanwhile, how is Clemson still undefeated? Do they have "first-round tournament bust" written all over them or what? SEC:
Did you hear about the ex-high school hoops coach who faces 39 various counts, not the least of which is hitting his players in the groin?
Early contender for Biggest Non-story of the (New) Year: Belichick's playoff post-game push.
Speaking of L'ville, is RB Michael Bush, who is jumping to the NFL, a bigger, bulkier, more talented version of Willis McGahee? The biggest difference: McGahee had four months to go from injury to draft day, one of the great rehabs in modern sports memory. Bush has an extra three months. I'd still draft him in the first round, ranking him just behind Adrian Peterson.
When Jason Kidd filed for divorce from his wife, he accused her of "extreme cruelty." Yikes. That can't simply be that she beat his ass in their nightly game of Boggle.
The dream is over for Rory Fitzpatrick: The NHL's story of the year – the write-in All-Star candidacy that earned a staggering 550K votes – fell 23,000 votes short. But it set a new standard for grassroots phenomena in the NHL and across fan-balloting in sports.
2016 Olympics: Chicago and LA are the finalists for the
Fan-Generated Super Bowl Ad Selected: Congrats to
And here's the most important point -- a prediction, actually: Bona's ad concept will be better than 85 percent of the ads created by the so-called "professionals" who brands are paying a mint to create these hellishly expensive and notoriously hit-or-miss spots.
(This is different than the CBS-sponsored YouTube promotion where someone will have their "15 seconds of fame" when their 15-second YouTube clip is played during the Super Bowl, also a great idea by increasingly user-generated-content-friendly CBS.)
* - Last note about McGwire: "I'm not here to talk about the past" essentially ruined his chances of making the Hall of Fame, this year, if not ever. All he had to do was be a little more candid in front of Congress, and he would have been forgiven. That was arguably the dumbest choice of talking-point in sports history. As I wrote at the time, McGwire should have 'fessed up to it, then immediately directed his mouth (and money) to "PED-ucation" among young athletes. Two-plus years later, he would have been an
-- D.S.
Posts
72 comments:
I think MLB and all Hall of Fames should use the method for selection that the NFL does. I believe the NFL has a select commitee of 15 people that is made up of writers, former players and former coaches who choose who should get in the hall. I think you need to people who know the sport by playing involved in the process.
Not to jump on Ohio State but it looks like there Basketball team might be as overrated as there football team. 13-0 against non-ranked opponents but 0-3 Against Ranked Teams.
Ugh...are you going to tell us that the SEC is the best basketball conference too?
Wisky is definitely looking good. But is Ohio State really that good? They are mostly freshmen and Oden looks like he isn't as ready for the NBA as people thought. They've played 3 good teams and lost to all 3.
Michael Bush is a dozer. I hope he's around for the Steelers (though the Steelers really need more defensive depth)
So is Jason Kidd taking over the mantle from Doug Christie? I know it said that the kids were abused by Joumana...but also that Jason was as well. Hmm.
I really have no problem with McGwire out of the Hall. Even without the steroids. But then, I'm a fan of small ball and defense, so Big Mac doesn't register a lot on my screen.
What is up with these messed up high school coaches?? Isn't this the 3rd or 4th story in the past 2 years of a high school coach physically/mentally/sexually abusing his players?
The Pac 10 is the best basketball conference this year.
The SEC and Big XII are next.
Then then the MVC.
I like Wisconsin every year as a 6 seed, and I always put them into my Sweet 16 round. But picking Big 10 teams deep into tournaments is usually a scary thing in March, and putting Wisconsin as a 1 or 2 would make me nervous as a Final Four pick.
actually, B10 has a good history of putting one and, several times, 2 teams in the FF.
"Extreme Cruelty" is just a common ground for fault divorce in most states. People can claim that and get a divorce without going into detail about what happened within the marriage. It's more about keeping one spouse from getting kids, money, etc. than about what actually happened (what is alleged is that she would beat up on Kidd...yeah, I'll bet). He's just trying to lower her alimony payments.
And I don't blame Pete Carroll for passing on any NFL job. The man has shown that in the NFL, he doesn't get the job done. Then again, he's constantly walked into hopeless situations. If he were offered, say, the Steelers job (yeah, right), he might be inclined to reconsider. Point is, it's easier to build a college program from the ground up than it is an NFL program.
That's a GREAT Super Bowl ad concept. Can't wait to see it.
how about this.....no flip-flopping on votes....once you vote for someone as a yes, they're a yes for the 15 years that they're on the ballot. That way vote totals can only go up, until they either get in or time runs out on their candidacy.
I like how quick people are to claim a team is over-rated when it loses. OSU has played at Florida, at UNC (pre-season 1 and 2) and at Wisconsin (number 4). That's 3 really tough road games. The only B10 team to win at Wisconsin in the past 3 years is Illinois (twice). Two of those games were close (OSU lead by 10 at UNC without Oden, had a chance to tie at the end of the UW game).
Let's see how they play the rest of their B10 season and how they progress (they are mostly Freshmen) before we jump off their bandwagon as over-rated. And don't even think about calling that football team overrated. Florida played an excellent ballgame, but that doesn't dismiss what the Buckeyes did all season.
ON WISCONSIN ON WISCONSIN! I was stoked about the game last night. Not only was it OSU's second big loss in as many nights, but WIS dominated most of that game (I think Bo decided to go uber-conservative, thinking his players would have made just ONE MORE FT to ice it). Great job by Flowers and Chris Roc, er, Kamron T. When your star has a crappy game and you can beat a team with as much talent as OSU has (I don't care if they're all frosh - they're good) you have a team built for March and April...
Remember, OSU's losses were to the 1, 2, and 3 ranked teams in the country. I'm interested to see if WIS leapfrogs UNC or FL. At least one voter will have the Badgers #1. War Tucker, ought seven's Player of the Year!
Jason Kidd disgusts me. He's got a lot of nerve considering he's the one with a history of battering his wife. It suprises me more people don't know about this.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/jasonkiddcall1.html
Why can't people give McGwire credit for being the only guy who told the truth in those hearings? He was the only guy who didn't perjure himself. Vote him in next year.
College b-ball. Ouch. It IS a down year for the Big East. Still, I like Calhoun, Boeheim and Pitino to turn things around in time for a conference run. Of course, they'll need to qualify first.
I tried to vote for Rory several times and each time I got a "oops etc..." message. Then when I filled out a ballot w/o Rory it got accepted. NHL conspiracy, YOU SUCK NHL!!! Why give the fans the vote and then censor them cause they don't like who they choose? Any press fo the NHL is good press at this point since almost nobody cares anymore, If Rory was on the All Star Team i'm sure at least a few more people woud be casually interested.
Tony Kornheiser is staying just so he can continue to expose Joe Theismann's idiotic commentary.
TK just... you know... was kind of reserved this year. If next year he starts letting loose, like he does with Michael Wilbon on PTI, then he'll live up to our expectations.
Why can't people give McGwire credit for being the only guy who told the truth in those hearings?
Refusing to answer a direct question does not equal telling the truth.
If Rory was selected to the All Star team every fans right to vote for an All Star team should of be taken away. The All Start voting process should not be a popularity contest or some silly campaign. It should be used to honor the best players in the game.
Dan, with UF in your top 5, does that include them losing their 4 year QB, and 10 seniors and then 5-6 more underclassmen to the draft??
even with Meyer's recruiting, that's a tough row to hoe, with Tebow having to actually pass the ball next year.
In Dan's defense, ESPN also picked UF as a potential Preseason #1 for next season based on the talent they have remaining. The cupboards aren't bare there (thanks to Zook's recruiting)
Remember, Ohio State lost 9 defensive starters from last year and still started this year at #1. This year, they will bring back their entire defense, lose their offense, and will still start top 5.
But the 2008/9 National Champs is going to be Alabama. Big name schools will always recruit well and so new coaches are usually able to quickly turn things around with a change in momemtum and one recruiting class to go with the momentum of their hiring. Look at Stoops in Oklahoma (2 years to champs), Tressel at OSU (2 years), Meyer at UF (2 years), Pete Carroll, and even Miles at LSU (top 5 finish in 2 years). Heck, even Virginia put together a top 5 recruiting class in Groh's first year and a run at the ACC Championship (including reaching #5 in the polls before collapses against FSU, Miami, and Tech) in his second year.
"What is up with these messed up high school coaches?? Isn't this the 3rd or 4th story in the past 2 years of a high school coach physically/mentally/sexually abusing his players?"
When Bob Knight is a role model for how to coach for 30 years, this is what you get. Indiana should have fired him 20 years ago and he should have left the game in disgrace.
Adrian Peterson and Michael Bush BOTH ahead of Marshawn Lynch? Where's the love? Lynch will easily be the best pro back out of this draft class...
CMFost- When has an all star game NOT been a popularity contest? Every year there are players voted in based on their name alone. It is always defended by commentators who say that it's the fans game and they can vote for who they want to see. Voting for a scrub is really any different. If the fans want to see him (no matter what reason) then they should get to see him.
Also, I do believe fans votes should be taken away. Fans are idiots, the best players should be rewarded. I think that was the whole point of the "Vote for Rory" campaign. To show that if the fans wanted to, they could rig it so a nobody cracked the system.
Props to the writers who did NOT vote for Ripken. Consecutive game streaks mean nothing in baseball to me. Now Brett Favre's streak is amazing whether you like the guy or not.
I looked up Cal's career stats. Very good. But great - no way. He had a few banner years. He also had some weak years. HOF material, not in my opinion. Lifetime .276.
(http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/stats_historical/mlb_individual_stats_player.jsp?playerID=121222)
Good but not great. 431 HRs, nice but not eye popping. 5 seasons above .300 batting average but 10 seasons below .270.
I would consider Cal from a statistical point of view to be an very good above average player. Now Tony Gwynn is a different story - he is HOF worthy in a second's notice.
actually, B10 has a good history of putting one and, several times, 2 teams in the FF.
I should have said "other than Michigan State."
Dan-
3 things:
1. i love when you use "The Simpsons" references in your columns ('Yoink' is a personal favorite of mine).
2. agreed- Bill Belichik shoving the camera man is a non-story, the only thing that the camera man was angry about was BB ruining his shot of BB and Eric The Mangini hugging . . . which i really didn't want to see anyway.
3. in your 'quickie' column on that other sports site for which you used to write, you had an item called "who has mo/no mo" where you listed 3 for each. any plans on resurrecting that?
Clemson is in the ACC for basketball, isn't it?
Maybe i misread that comment, but it seemed you were talking about them in the SEC?
oh i re-read that, nevermind. i thought you were including Clemson in the SEC thoughts, my bad! :)
Cycledan, you are forcing me to pull out the Ripken stats again!
First, here are where several prominent baseball historians rank Ripken among All-time shortstops:
Nate Davis (USAToday): 1st
Rob Neyer (ESPN): 3rd
Bill James: 3rd
The Baseball Analysts: 4th
The Baseball Prospectus recently rated Ripken's 1991 season as the 2nd greatest of ALL-TIME (using WARP-3 statistical analysis) behind just Ruth's 1923 season (and ahead of Bonds' steroid seasons).
Ripken's list of accomplishments will be below since they are too long to list in this post.
In response to cycledan:
Brett Favre SUUUUUUUUCKS!
How you can demean Cal Ripken and trumpet Brett Favre in consecutive sentences boggles my mind.
• 1982 AL Rookie of the Year Award
• Member of the 1981 Topps All-Star Rookie Team and 1982 Topps All-Star Rookie Team, the only player to ever be on more than one
• 19-time AL All-Star (1983-2001)
• 2-time AL MVP (1983 & 1991)
• 2-time All-Star Game MVP (1991 & 2001)
• 2-time AL Gold Glove Winner (1991 & 1992)
• 8-time AL Silver Slugger Award Winner (1983-1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 & 1994)
• Home Runs: 431
• RBIs: 1695
• Hits: 3184
Major League Records
• Most ever home runs as a Shortstop:345
• Consecutive games, 2632
• Consecutive innings, 8234 (unofficial)
Career Range Factor of 4.62 per game...higher than Omar Vizquel whom some say is almost as good as Ozzie.
1990 Cal set the fielding percentage record for a shortstop.
Two Gold Gloves
Led the league in assists several times.
I gotta believe that, somewhere, Doug Christie is nodding and wondering what it would take to be half the man Jason Kidd is. Then, he gets his ass beat by his wife.
Sorry that I used some of those stats from yesterday's post. Those are just some of the statistical reasons Cal deserves the HoF. I'm not saying he is a top 10 all-time player. But he is in the "Pantheon" no matter what Simmons and his followers say.
When you include the non-statistical, Ripken's career is even greater. Besides "the Lap" when he broke Gehrig's record, he brought out the best in fans.
In 2001, after he announced his retirement, I went to see the O's play in a meaningless series in Atlanta. For once, the Braves had sold out. Everytime Cal's name was called, the fans cheered vehemently. He hit two home runs in that game. Each time as the ball rocketed out of the stadium, the Atlanta crowd leapt to its feet and gave him standing ovations. All this from an opposing crowd. That is greatness.
Ok, McGwire was the only guy in there who didn't actually lie. He also didn't expose everyone because he's not a money-grubbing jerk.
From WashPost:
"What did the others say?
Palmeiro denied having used steroids, while Sosa -- or his lawyers -- crafted an opening statement in which he said he has never used "illegal performance-enhancing drugs," has never "injected myself or had anyone inject me with anything," and has not "broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic." "
So, all in all, I think Mark took the most flack, but was the only honorable guy there. He didn't throw everyone under the bus, and he didn't try to lie to preserve his legacy. He specifically said that he couldn't reveal things without hurting people around him, and I believe that's enough reason not to reveal everything. He's an ex-player, and one of the few honest ones at that hearing.
That was a very interesting list, and you are right about UVA that year. In response to the comment about Tebow...why is everyone so quick to jump on Tebow's throwing abilities. The guy has an absolute laser as seen infrequently this year and throughout high school (mainly what we have to go on right now). Further, why would he have ever thrown this year. Meyer used him to perfection to change pace and tried to disallow potential Freshman mistakes by limiting his passes. I am not disagreeing with you "dawg gone", just wondering if there are things that I am missing as I am ecstatic about the #1 DUAL threat QB getting to step in and do what he does next year.
Dave - Favre does not suck. 3 MVPs and a super bowl win. Not a lot of guys who can say that. In fact, there aren't any, other than Brett.
Mike - Dude, lay off the Ripken Juice. He had about 6 or 7 great seasons. He's a hall-of-famer. But is he the best SS of all-time? No way. He wasn't the best offensive SS and he wasn't the best defensive SS. He was good enough for a ton of years. That's it. I'd take Miggie and A-Rod (perhaps even Jeter and Nomar) in their primes over Cal in his prime. And I don't even have to start mentioning Smith, Banks, Pee-Wee, etc...
"The Baseball Prospectus recently rated Ripken's 1991 season as the 2nd greatest of ALL-TIME (using WARP-3 statistical analysis) behind just Ruth's 1923 season (and ahead of Bonds' steroid seasons)."
This just tells me that the WARP-3 has been discredited. Just a ridiculous statement.
Eric, you dont have to believe in stats or accomplishments. Maybe you blame Cal for not hitting 580-ft steroid-fueled home runs like McGwire and even Miggy. And yes, he tailed off the last few seasons of his career. But in his prime (and the stats back it up), he was a devastating offensive shortstop who changed the position. A-rod will go down as a greater player, even though he will end up playing more games at other positions than shortstop. But Jeter and Nomar couldnt hold Ripken's jock on their best day.
Maybe I am on Ripken "juice" but it seems like alot of posters act like "Comic Book Guy" from the Simpsons and have to criticize everything from their basement.
If you can give one ounce of statistical evidence that Jeter, Nomar or even God-forbid Pee Wee Reese were better shortstops than Cal, please let's see it. Otherwise, your comments are the ones discredited and ridiculous.
Does anyone bashing Ripken's accomplishments think that Nomar, Jeter and A-Fraud would have become SS if was not for him. The guy changed the position. Do not mention Ernie Banks because although he went in as a SS he played just as many games at 1st.
In response to Eric:
Brett Favre won his 3 MVP's from 95-97...that's approximately 10 years ago!
In addition, we've been having a discussion about Pro-bowl voting as a popularity contest, what do you think MVP voting is?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I hope Brett Favre doesn't retire and keeps playing, because the longer he plays the harder it is for people who love him to defend his terrible play.
In conclusion, Brett Favre SUUUUUUCKS.
Jeter is hitting about 40 points higher for average than Ripken. He is on pace to tie him in RBI, he already has stolen over 200 more bases has the same number of gold gloves was rookie of the year...and he was instrumental in winning four championships. He is missing the MVP (but almost got it this year). He doesn't have the power numnbers (Home Runs) but does have the run production (RBI + Runs - HR) Cal's for a 21 year career is 2911. Jeter is already at 1954 in half the time and he is in his prime right now.
Here's a wild idea about McGwire: When anyone asks why he's not in or if he should get in, lets all just say "we're not here to talk about the past." What's everyone think??
With regard to Favre, just because he is on the decline as he approaches forty, doesn't mean he still wasn't one of the best QBs ever. His numbers dont lie and he was a three time MVP and a super bowl champ. Just because he isn't the top QB in the league any more doesn't take away from his awesome career. (And he did lead a pretty bad team to the cusp of the playoffs this year).
I was a little too zealous in my defense of Ripken and I shouldnt have bashed Jeter. He is a future HoF. Using run production stat, Jeter may catch Cal, but remember Jeter is playing entirely in an offensive era, while Cal played in the 80s relatively "dead ball" era. It's one of the reasons stats for guys like Rice and Dale Murphy look so bad compared to today's stats.
I also think Favre and Cal are good comparisons. One poster said Cal "only" had 6 or 7 great seasons. How many has Favre had? But that is enough to make Favre and all-time great too. They both hung around past their prime, so people forget how great they were during their primes.
Mike – I’m using four seasons because Nomar was injured after 4. I’d prefer 6 but, what can you do???
Nomar’s 4 best seasons were from 97-00. He was injured the next year and was never the same. Over that period, he batted .337 and .384 OBP. He averaged 28.25 home runs and 105 RBIs. 13.25 SBs per year
Jeter’s best 4 in a row (his prime) seem to be from 98-01. Over that period, he batted .331 and .398 OBP. He averaged 19.75 home runs and 83.25 RBI. 24.5 SBs per year.
I don’t know Ripken’s best four seasons. I chose 83 (MVP year) and 89-91 (perhaps his “prime” with that 91 season?). Over that period, he batted .288 and .351 OBP. He averaged 25.75 home runs with 98.25 RBI. 4 SBs per year.
I really could care less if you’d choose Ripken’s 4 years over Nomar and Jeter. You clearly love Cal. That’s fine. But I think it illustrates the point that it’s silly to put Ripken up on such a pedestal when we were watching these guys have better primes just a few years ago (and I didn’t even do Miggie or A-Rod). Cal was a class-act, no doubt. But that doesn’t make him a better baseball player than these guys.
Love the silly reference to A-Rod’s position. He was a gold-glove SS before he decided to play on the Yankees. That doesn’t discredit his ability to play the position. You’ll note even Cal didn’t stay at short his whole career – he had to move not because of a choice, but because of ability.
Further, love the reference to the Simpsons. But in the age of the internet, when information is so readily available to users, why is it necessary for me to make a few quick calculations and post players’ stats when it is just as easy for you to look it up? Think of it as an implied footnote to google it yourself. It’s not like I (or anyone else here) just posts crap without having a) firsthand experience with the subject or b) looks something up. At least, I would hope not.
Cal Ripken is obviously the greatest SS of all time, with 902 career HRs, a .402 batting average, and tons of hot model girlfriends during his career.
(Oh, what's this you say? You have the internet and can prove that I'm wrong? I have to start doing RESEARCH now, eric? Thanks a bunch, dude.)
Dave - if MVP is a popularity contest, who would you have chosen during Favre's MVP years instead of Favre, assuming Favre's titles were because he was an apt player who was great with the media and not because he actually deserved them?
For instance, I fully buy your claim - that it is a popularity contest - but usually the deserving candidate wins. However, as I've stated this in earlier posts, Steve Nash won the last 2 NBA MVPs because of his popularity with the media. I made the argument for Shaq and LeBron/Kobe in those years. Who was better than Favre?
I hope he keeps playing, too. Just on the Bears next year, so he'll have a chance to show some of his remaining skills.
Sorry for the extended stat list below. I swear this will be the last one. Anyway, the numbers below are Wins Above Replacement PLayer for Ripken, Jeter and Nomar for the first 11 years of their careers. It takes the era out of the equation and makes everything equal. Jeter and Nomar had some fine seasons (9.7 is hall of fame worthy), but neither of them reached Ripken in his prime.
The raw stats are different because of the era each played in. Cal played his prime in the 80s and that makes a huge difference. Jeter is definitely headed to the HoF, while Nomar got derailed by injury.
Ripken
1982- 8.2
1983- 13.9
1984- 15.0
1985- 10.9
1986- 12.5
1987- 7.2
1988- 9.7
1989- 10.1
1990- 9.4
1991- 17.0
1992- 6.8
Jeter
1996- 6.7
1997- 6.7
1998- 9.3
1999- 11.1
2000- 7.4
2001- 7.1
2002- 6.5
2003- 4.7
2004- 8.2
2005- 11.8
2006- 12.1
Nomar
1997- 10.2
1998- 9.2
1999- 11.3
2000- 11.5
2001- 1.2
2002- 9.4
2003- 8.7
2004 (AL)- 1.5
2004 (NL)- 1.6
2005- 1.3
2006- 4.2
Mike, is WARP a measure of how good Ripken was, or how bad all the other SS's were? Seems that guys like Jeter & Nomar's WARP isn't as high because there are a bunch of good SS's playing now(Jeter, Nomar, Tejada, A-Rod when he was a SS, etc.). I'm not saying Ripken wasn't good, but using this WARP stat doesn't prove that Ripken was better than Nomar & Jeter simply because he played in an era where offensive stats weren't that high.
I dont think it is a case where guys in the 80's werent that good, it is just that the ball and the players werent juiced. And I am in no way implying Jeter juiced, I think it is pretty obvious he is clean. But other shortstops of the time included guys like Yount and Trammell who would match up in any era. And it is a shame Trammell is getting no HoF support.
Ok, I've spent way too much work time looking up stats today. Sorry for boring everyone. I just wanted to make a statistical case for Cal since his credentials were questioned. I will let the stats speak for themselves. Quick thoughts:
Jeter: FIrst Ballot HoF
Favre: All-time great
Trammell: SHould be HoF
Let's get back to things we can agree on like Dan is a bandwagon homer for cheering on Florida!
(Actually, I am heading to Simmons' chat on ESPN)
Not sure if anyone still/actually reads the AM Jump at ESPN, but I think DJ Gallo is trying pretty hard to get some sexual humor in today's version:
"A Huge Taint"
"Experiencing a Night of Hard Wood in College"
Why is baseball held to a higher standard than any other sport in regards to its athletes and moral values (ie cheating, gambling, etc)?
Let's all stick our heads in the sand and pretend that drugs havent contributed to some of NFLs greatest and longest careers. I was in high school in the early 90s and coaches/parents/boosters/anybody that thought it would give their team an edge were pushing weight training and drugs at that time to the high school players.
Do you think it started at the HS level and worked its way up to the college and NFL ranks?
It's ridiculus to think everybody is playing on an even playing field in any sport in any sports era. As long as it is a competition someone is going to find a way to bend the rules or have an advantage that hasnt even been thought of to ban yet.
The people keeping Big Mac out of the HOF are the same people that watched in amazement at the home run derbys, batting practice, each plate appearance to see what this man could do to a baseball. All of the time knowing there was no way 'conditioning' could ever make someones arms that size.
We are happy to put on the blinders for our entertainment and then become hypocrites and blister the same man for making choices that we think are immoral.
Why is anyone debating Ripken? He's in. It's over. Move on.
The most honest guy..the only honest guy..in those Senate hearings was Canseco.
Put him in the HOF.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure Bob Knight didn't make his players practice nude, hit them in the groin, pour water and freeze them in winter, etc.
Bob Knight yells at players. That's it. Anyone who points out the "choke" of Reed or the "slap" of the Tech player this year...please. Contact lasting less than a second does not qualify as beating someone.
Barbaro has a setback. Hoof Tissue removed.
are you fucking kidding me? Seriously...this is news?! It'd be one thing if Barbaro actually won the Triple Crown...oh, wait..no it wouldn't matter, because he's a horse.
I have almost lost my will to live after reading this.
Saying Ripken is not a HoF'er is not interesting, it is not clever and it is not controversial. It is just plain dumb and anyone who says so should not be talking baseball. But what good is it to rip "fans" for being idiots, when BBWAA themselves can't get it right? All I know is, that around 85 % of the voters should not be allowed to vote. That's how many who decided, at one point or another, that Bert Blyleven is not a HoF'er.....
It's amazing how quickly things are forgotten, but Freddy Sanchez garnered 856,685 votes as a write-in for the NL All-star team this year. In addition, Jason Bay went from not being even in the top 10 in voting to the number one vote-getter for NL outfielders on a grass-root campaign. Seems a bit bigger than Rory Fitzpatrick.
oasis and raf - who said Ripken isn't a HOFer? Did anyone? I don't think so. That wasn't what the discussion was about. It was about everyone getting *very* excited about Cal and whether he'd be "unanimous" in the vote. I take issue with that because he's overrated, in my opinion. You can check my posts over the last two days - I've consistently maintained he's a HOFer - he's just overrated.
Man, how can you read something without actually reading it?
Dave – I just don’t know what to tell you. Are the stats you mentioned interesting? Sure. But there’s really no statistical way to definitively judge defense in baseball (or football or basketball, for that matter). You have to use your eyes. This reminds me of Gladwell’s most recent book, Blink. You’ve probably read it (half the country has, it seems). You had to have watched Cal (in 1991) and Ozzie (1986) or Omar (1995ish) to appreciate how much better the latter were than the former. I did. I’m sure some of you did as well. There’s no comparison, and that’s why as fun as it is to devise defensive charts, etc, to show who has more range, etc, it just doesn’t work. As for Win Shares? Yes, its fun. But it is ridiculous to compare players from different generations/years that way. It’s really only good for telling you who was good in a certain year, and even then the methodology can be questioned.
Further – players have up and down years. Why is it so hard for anyone to entertain the idea that the 80’s (Generally) was just a bad decade of baseball. I mean, players started making tons of cash. Coke exploded. It was the decade of “excess” without the nutritional and health consciousness of the 90’s and oughts. I mean, it isn’t improbable that the average player in the 80s would be terrible if he was transplanted into the 90s and oughts (or 70s for that matter). And it may have been the general lack of weightraining in the 80s that caused power numbers to be low (remember the myths about how it decreased flexibility and athleticism???) Just saying.
"Bob Knight yells at players. That's it. Anyone who points out the "choke" of Reed or the "slap" of the Tech player this year...please. Contact lasting less than a second does not qualify as beating someone."
He kicked his own son in the shin on national television. That IS beating, if you don't think getting kicked in the shin hurts like hell you're crazy. He is a disgrace to college basketball.
Cycledan said...
I looked up Cal's career stats. Very good. But great - no way. He had a few banner years. He also had some weak years. HOF material, not in my opinion.
You see, Eric, I was paying attention.... ;-)
My bad, Oasis. I fully retract that statement.
I, on the other hand, was not paying attention. :)
And Steve...well, we'll disagree then. I don't think Knight's a disgrace to the sport. I'd send my kid to play for him.
But my kids will be pro baseball players, so it won't happen.
Tom Coughlin gets a 1-year extension. Wow. Totally unexpected. At least that's one MORE place that the Steelers can't lose one of their two HC candidates... what's left? AZ and Miami?
I think the giants are giving coughlin the extra year so they can dump him next year and pick up cowher after his year off.
I promise -- no more college football -- after this post I mean. At least it isn't about Cal or the HoF.
My biggest complaint about the SEC is that they don't play good non-conference opponents. Well, next year, LSU plays Virginia Tech, and both Alabama and Florida play Florida State. Tennessee plays at Cal. So I will give credit where credit is due.
And Dan -- I appreciate the blog and am glad you keep it up. Do you work now as well? or just blog? hmmm.....
Yeah. But its looking more and more like Whis will take the Pittsburgh job and Grimm will remain an assistant.
actually, that's just my opinion.
I don't know if anybody else saw it, but ESPN's front page right now is the College Football TOP 25 for NEXT SEASON.
The only glaring omission is Hawai'i.
I would find somewhere in the TOP 25 for my main man COLT BRENNAN.
Oh man -- Just when I thought I could leave this college season in the past, you gotta bring up Hawaii.
I used to be a UH season ticket holder and got used to seeing guys like Chang and Rolovich run up yards like pinball. So what Brennan was doing didn't impress me at all. But, I was at the Hawaii bowl against ASU. Brennan is the real deal! He is probably the best college quarterback I have seen in the past 10 years or so at reading coverages and throwing the ball on time to the right spot. He's accurate, good arm, good vision. If I had seen him in person earlier, he would have been my own Heisman favorite - and I'm a Buckeyes fan!
Just because Knight is hardass doesn't put him in the same league as this asshole. And I don't even particularly like Knight. As a general rule, you can't blame the actions of one adult on another.
McGwire may have juiced, but a part of me feels bad that he is most ridiculed for deliberately not lying to Congress, when he so easily could have. But then, the other side is, he probably knew that he could be caught and didn't want to commit perjury. He should really just be ridiculed for juicing.
Thanks Rafael!
Am I the only one who doesn't give a flying fuck about Barbaro's hoof?
Just to clarify a previous comment, when I was comparing Favre and Ripken, I was only comparing their consecutive game streaks.
How about Duke losing again and UConn losing? Also Clemson is 17-0, go figure. I just hope Syracuse can win tonight and jump back into the top 25.
Post a Comment